at this stage you sound like King Canute trying to hold back the tide with a spoon
Cnut didn't think he could hold back the tide, he stood on the shore and ordered the sea not to come in as a demonstration to his fawning courtiers that he was not all powerful.
The people voted to leave,
they voted to leave the political union, and they did so based on promises made by the leave campaign, here are some of those promises:
Oddly enough, now they've got leave over the line, the goalposts have moved, and now only a no deal brexit is the real deal. When they've got that, no doubt they'll only be happy when the UK has been towed into the middle of the Atlantic.
All that results from the events of the last week is to hogtie your government's negotiating position and if there is a deal it will be a bad one bad for your country,
what deal do you think they were going to get? one where the EU undermine the integrity of their own single market and pretend that WTO rules don't apply to the UK? This is deluded fantasy, i very much doubt even boris himself thought it was possible, the no deal blustering was far more likely to be for the benefit of MPs, to get them to vote through some cosmetically altered version of May's deal, most likely with a NI only backstop.
The whole remain side are being used by the institutions and people who benefit hugely from the EU
Has it occurred to you that the leave side are being used by people who benefit from Brexit?
for them to vote to leave would be like barristers voting to end free legal aid, or indeed farmers to abolish the CAP
Or, you know, perhaps they're people doing their job and voting in a way that they feel is in the best interests of the country and the constituents they represent.
If you don't want to reply that's fine, but if you do please don't write an essay that adresses none of my points.
Do you think the only people who can see your posts are you and I? you can choose to lie or misrepresent what i've said if you want, and other people can read what both of us have written and judge for themselves who is being the most reasonable, and indeed reasoned.
Tell us what you think should happen at this stage, now an election has been blocked what on earth is going to happen in parliament at the end of October,
I don't think an election will necessarily decide brexit, we could simply end up back where we are with no party having a majority. The election we had in 2017 was supposed to resolve this, and instead created a stalemate. this stalemate was the democratic will of the UK people however. rather than make an election which ought to be about all issues an election focused solely on brexit, and forcing people to choose between a no deal brexit and a Corbyn govt, have a referendum, preferably where the leave option is clearly outlined and the result is legally binding so that there are real consequences to the sort of illegal activity that would have rendered the 2016 one nul and void if it had been binding.
what's the problem with having another vote, if you are convinced that brexit is really what the majority want?