c4l
Well-Known Member
rather stick with the jd 1360 trailed mowers dad has thanks
rather stick with the jd 1360 trailed mowers dad has thanks
It was offered to scoffcrudlerather stick with the jd 1360 trailed mowers dad has thanks
Go and have a look it won't hurt, maybe a cheeky offer, be handy to have a bit more mowing capacity..............................Don’t encourage me.
As tidy as that 50 is, presuming that price is plus vat, it would be around €5500 by the time she would be home
I wouldnt like to be paying much more for it tbh.
Trouble is I know the seller,he typically buys scrap mowers and bodges them up,the bed pictures dont look great I've seen power harrows with less mud stuck to them.Go and have a look it won't hurt, maybe a cheeky offer, be handy to have a bit more mowing capacity..............................
Think they buy a good bit of stuff at auction and move it on. Have certainly had tractors from Euro Auctions. Always advertising mowers on Facebook
anything like 255 stay well away that would be money wasted in my opinionold man been searching for a baler for a while now, all he wants is one with a chopper and the sensors on both sides of the baler. came across a few welgers 220's, 235's and 245's but they were wanting around 10-13k for em with 40k bales up on the clock. too me thats a bit expensive. branched out into mchale f550, f5500 same thing pretty much. they just seem to expensive for the amount of bales up on the clock but that being said, they could be contractors machines and the bale count is that high because they dont pack the bales enough thus l'm thinking little wear inside the chambers. he did come across a claas 354. €12500+vat they were looking for it. 25k bales up on the clock and from the photos we saw, it looks clean (came across it in the classifieds i think). any of ye can shine a light on claas balers? dont hear much about em compared to welgers and mchales but from what little we heard of, the term "they're made of tinfoil" seemed to be a common theme but we aint doing a high number of bales every year so i doubt that be an issue to us
That will be it...they could be contractors machines and the bale count is that high because they dont pack the bales enough thus l'm thinking little wear inside the chambers.
Mchale vs welger. Good god man, are you trying to start a war!old man been searching for a baler for a while now, all he wants is one with a chopper and the sensors on both sides of the baler. came across a few welgers 220's, 235's and 245's but they were wanting around 10-13k for em with 40k bales up on the clock. too me thats a bit expensive. branched out into mchale f550, f5500 same thing pretty much. they just seem to expensive for the amount of bales up on the clock but that being said, they could be contractors machines and the bale count is that high because they dont pack the bales enough thus l'm thinking little wear inside the chambers. he did come across a claas 354. €12500+vat they were looking for it. 25k bales up on the clock and from the photos we saw, it looks clean (came across it in the classifieds i think). any of ye can shine a light on claas balers? dont hear much about em compared to welgers and mchales but from what little we heard of, the term "they're made of tinfoil" seemed to be a common theme but we aint doing a high number of bales every year so i doubt that be an issue to us
Claas or john deere if your looking for value....He says he was never impressed by claas.!
I think myself its claas he should be looking at..
have our own wrapper. still running around with a nh 644 belt baler. brilliant baler for the straw and hay but when it comes to silage bales, the old man just wants something with a chopper. be only doing a few hundred silage bales a year at most. not crazy numbers. jd balers my dad is not a fan of. friend of ours had one and just caused him headaches since it arrived on the farm. he got a f5500 now. krone balers is a big no no from my dad. anything that is a chain baler is a big no no with him. that being said, the number of baler on the list is shortened quite a bit. now take out the combi balers and fusions from the list, very few left according to dad. it is his money after all. dont get me wrong, fusions are good, but would want a fusion 2 over the first fusion and realistically speaking, would want at least 190-210hp to power one properly. lads round here that have complain quite a bit about em down to the fact they are using the likes of tm150's and 6630's. grand tractors alright but fuel consumption is one, then hillish and wettish ground is another, recipe for spending more money than needed. that being said i'm sure our tm165 be grand for pulling one but she is already heavy on the fuel doing other jobs. all we are doing is just baling, drawing them back to the yard and wrapping. a fusion or combi is not in our best interests atmHave you a wrapper ? Buy a clean fusion 1 for a little bit more money
what about the 300 series claas balers?anything like 255 stay well away that would be money wasted in my opinion
He says he was never impressed by claas.!
I think myself its claas he should be looking at..
No matter what baler you use, you'll use lots of diesel, thats a given.have our own wrapper. still running around with a nh 644 belt baler. brilliant baler for the straw and hay but when it comes to silage bales, the old man just wants something with a chopper. be only doing a few hundred silage bales a year at most. not crazy numbers. jd balers my dad is not a fan of. friend of ours had one and just caused him headaches since it arrived on the farm. he got a f5500 now. krone balers is a big no no from my dad. anything that is a chain baler is a big no no with him. that being said, the number of baler on the list is shortened quite a bit. now take out the combi balers and fusions from the list, very few left according to dad. it is his money after all. dont get me wrong, fusions are good, but would want a fusion 2 over the first fusion and realistically speaking, would want at least 190-210hp to power one properly. lads round here that have complain quite a bit about em down to the fact they are using the likes of tm150's and 6630's. grand tractors alright but fuel consumption is one, then hillish and wettish ground is another, recipe for spending more money than needed. that being said i'm sure our tm165 be grand for pulling one but she is already heavy on the fuel doing other jobs. all we are doing is just baling, drawing them back to the yard and wrapping. a fusion or combi is not in our best interests atm