Just reading through that paper and it’s far from conclusive.
It seems to have been compiled by those with Organic agriculture as their preference (which is fair enough if they’re trying to defend it).
The title could even give that away, to be impartial the word conventional could be placed before organic but it’s the other way around….
They admit in the conclusions that there’s not enough proof for a definitive statement.
They also go on about the dangerous OP chemicals, these haven’t been used in European agriculture for years.
View attachment 128346
I couldn’t say that Glyphosate is good for the health but I can’t see any proof that it’s bad for it either.
People seem to be drawn to binary results - either something is “good” for you or “bad” for you. Too many people don’t consider that at acceptable levels perhaps something makes no difference to your health!
With regard to food, I think that over processing of food should be of much greater concern in terms of our health than whether it was produced organically or not.